|
At GeePC our mission is to provide expert computer repair and maintenance at reasonable rates. Unlike many computer repair services, our business model is to provide you with all information about your problem, fix it in a professional manner, and finally give you the knowledge and tools to help yourself in the future. Never will we sell you a part you do not need, nor suggest unnecessary repairs. We pride ourselves on honesty and integrity. We specialize in: - PC Repair / Hardware Support
- Custom PC Building / Gaming Computers
- Spyware / Virus Removal
- Home Networking
- Software Troubleshooting
- Website Design
|
|
|
It should come as no surprise that a security firm, in this case Sophos, is casting the act of using a neighbor's unsecured Wi-Fi access point as a crime. The bigger the threat, the more money there is for security solution vendors and consultants. In the latest research, Sophos found that 54% of wireless users surveyed had "stolen" access at one time or another. The report then frames these casual users as thieves by lumping them in with the epithet "cybercriminals". My policy is along the lines of many others: If a hosting Wi-Fi owner transmits a signal into your property or public area, and that signal proactively announces an SSID which functions like an invite, yet the host has left the network unlocked, then the host's DHCP server actively accommodates the guest and offers an IP address for them to use... then why would any casual user suppose the host's intention is not to share that Wi-Fi? Certainly the host's actions indicate an intent to share. There is no lock breached, there is no violation of private property. There is no trespass. But forget these technical arguments, let's look at the Sophos data: a 54% majority of Wi-Fi users have shared someone's Wi-Fi (and I'd say more have but weren't aware). Are the majority of people really cybercriminals? Also, if victims need to be told that they were "robbed" by Sophos research and a press release, and sensationalist news stories, just how victimized were they? Yes, there are real risks to offering an open AP, so we advise most people to lock down their Wi-Fi. That doesn't make criminals of cybervisitors.
Obviously, the situation can be very different if just a few parameters are changed: - If ANY kind of hack or bypass is needed to get through some form of security, then the innocence of the visitor is highly dubious. Even the easily hacked WEP is 100% functional as a signal that the host does not want "visitors".
- Any kind of viewing, or messing around inside the host's LAN, PCs, and other equipment is illegal through existing laws. Doing so is no longer a victimless activity.
Of course, GeePC can provide you with the setup needed to keep anyone from leeching your internet connection. |
|
|
